- Patriot Soup – Hunting Pedovores: Who Is Lewis Arthur and VOP?
- Mandalay Bay Owner Sues Las Vegas Victims To Avoid Liability
- World War 3 Was Just Planned During This Secret Meeting
- Sheriff of Dallas County Dishonors Fallen Hero Homero Caulderon
- These Types of Christians Are at Great Risk of Renouncing Jesus
- End Time Babylon – Officially Sodom & Gomorrah – PlannedParenthood Launches “Freedom to F–k”
- Significance of The July 28th Blood Moon – Peace Prosperity and Security – End Times over Israel
- What’s The Difference Between The New World Order and The One World Order?
- Father of Parkland School Shooting Survivors Shot Dead At Convenience Store
- DEVOTIONAL: A Prayer for Righteous Speech – God Hates Gossip
- The Truth of The Matter: Will Roe V. Wade Be Turned Over?
- Petition To Preserve Traditional Values in America & Confirm Judge Kavanaugh
- Senator Rand Paul Expresses Concern Over The “Integrity of US Elections”
An Unconscious Man With Words “Do Not Resuscitate” Tattooed On His Chest Confused ER Physicians
An unconscious man with the words “Do Not Resuscitate” tattooed on his chest left emergency room physicians questioning how to proceed at a Florida hospital.
The unnamed elderly man had no identification and no family members with him, according to The New England Journal of Medicine. His tattoo had a signature beneath it that was presumed to be his own.
Paramedics transported the 70-year-old man who was suffering from atrial fibrillation, an irregular heartbeat, to the emergency room at a University of Miami hospital, according to a case study published in The New England Journal of Medicine. He had an elevated blood-alcohol level, was diabetic, and had a history of pulmonary disease.
Initially, the conflicted doctors who wrote the case study — Gregory E. Holt, M.D., Ph.D.; Bianca Sarmento, M.D.; Daniel Kett, M.D.; and Kenneth W. Goodman, Ph.D. — didn’t honor the man’s tattoo since he was unable to discuss his goals for care.
“We initially decided not to honor the tattoo, invoking the principle of not choosing an irreversible path when faced with uncertainty,” the four University of Miami doctors wrote in the case study.
They treated the man with antibiotics, intravenous fluids, and a bi-pap machine to sustain life while social workers searched for next of kin and with the state of Florida for a written DNR request.
The Florida Department of Health doesn’t consider do-not-resuscitate tattoos valid.
After a case review, ethics consultants advised the hospital to honor the patient’s DNR tattoo.
“[I]t was most reasonable to infer that the tattoo expressed an authentic preference, that what might be seen as caution could also be seen as standing on ceremony, and that the law is sometimes not nimble enough to support patient-centered care and respect for patients’ best interests,” the study authors wrote.
The patient’s health declined, and he died later that night without intervening measure to save him.
Later, social workers did obtain a copy of the man’s written Florida Department of Health “out-of-hospital” DNR order, which was consistent with the tattoo and the ethics consultants recommendations.
The authors noted that this case study neither supports or opposes the use of tattoos to express end-of-life wishes.
Take Action Now: 1. Subscribe to our RSS feed 2. Receive your copy of The Bill of Rights 3. Share This Page With a Friend or Family Member 4. Call The White House Press Secretary (202-456-1111) as well as your state representatives to express your grievances. 5. Don't ever stop studying and sharing!!! God Bless America ~ Long Live The Republic ~ One Nation Under God ~ UNDIVIDED
~ Biselliano the truth powered by The Truth