Sponsored: Prepare For The Storm With MyPatriotSupply's Emergency Food Kits Today - Get The Best Deal Here


old eternal affairs truth media header banner

John Durham Releases Final Report, Concludes FBI Had No Verified Intel to Open Probe on Trump

comey-fbi-usatoday-com-2022-truth

The prosecutor faulted the department and the FBI for failing to follow their own standards and allowing a probe to persist, including the surveillance of an American citizen, without basis under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

John Durham Releases Final Report, Concludes FBI Had No Verified Intel to Open Probe on Trump

John Solomon reports: 

comey-fbi-usatoday-com-2022-truth
IMAGE VIA usatoday.com

Special Counsel John Durham released a damning final report Monday after more than three years investigating the Russia collusion probe, declaring the FBI had no verified intelligence or evidence when it opened the Crossfire Hurricane probe of President Donald Trump’s campaign in the summer of 2016. The prosecutor, however, recommended no new criminal charges.

“Neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation,” Durham wrote in a 300-plus page report sent to Congress and others and obtained by Just the News.

DOJ was slated to make the report public later Monday.

The prosecutor faulted the department and the FBI for failing to follow their own standards and allowing a probe to persist, including the surveillance of an American citizen, without basis under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

[fyrebox oid=”pNvEGJVD0″ gid=”9KAQNoY0Q”]


Truth Premium
CLICK HERE -->I Want Truth Premium

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


Please use the buttons to TWEET & SHARE this valuable content ... then leave your thoughts & feelings in the COMMENT SECTION ... finally If you haven't joined TRUTH PREMIUM, what are you waiting for?