old eternal affairs truth media header banner

Facebook Quietly Admits in Court Filing that ‘Fact Checks’ Are Actually Just Opinion

fact-checkers-naturalnews-com-2021-truth

The stunning admission about the nature of fact-checks was made by Meta in a court filing

Facebook Quietly Admits in Court Filing that ‘Fact Checks’ Are Actually Just Opinion

fact-checkers-naturalnews-com-2021-truth
IMAGE VIA naturalnews.com

Trump / Vance 2024 - White

GET YOUR FLAG HERE TODAY


Legally speaking, third-party fact-checks used on Meta’s social network Facebook are just ‘opinions’ and not statements of fact, according to the tech company. It earlier said it reserves the right to fact-check opinion pieces.

The stunning admission about the nature of fact-checks was made by Meta in a court filing in a case brought against the social network by libertarian pundit John Stossel.

In a suit filed in September, Stossel claimed that Facebook and a third-party vendor defamed him, by labeling a video about wildfires he posted on his page. The label read: “Missing Context. Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people,” and urged readers to click a button to “see why.” The link led to an explanation debunking a claim, which Stossel said he never made in his video.

Defending its fact-checking process before a US district court in California, Meta explained that the labels used by Facebook “are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion.” The same is true for the explanations that the labels link to, the filing argued.

Read More Here!




Truth Premium
CLICK HERE -->I Want Truth Premium


Trump Terminator BobbleHead Doll - 2024 - Take America Back


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Buy Me A Coffee

Please use the buttons to TWEET & SHARE this valuable content ... then leave your thoughts & feelings in the COMMENT SECTION ... finally If you haven't joined TRUTH PREMIUM, what are you waiting for?