Facebook Quietly Admits in Court Filing that ‘Fact Checks’ Are Actually Just Opinion

fact-checkers-naturalnews-com-2021-truth

The stunning admission about the nature of fact-checks was made by Meta in a court filing

Facebook Quietly Admits in Court Filing that ‘Fact Checks’ Are Actually Just Opinion

fact-checkers-naturalnews-com-2021-truth
IMAGE VIA naturalnews.com

Legally speaking, third-party fact-checks used on Meta’s social network Facebook are just ‘opinions’ and not statements of fact, according to the tech company. It earlier said it reserves the right to fact-check opinion pieces.

The stunning admission about the nature of fact-checks was made by Meta in a court filing in a case brought against the social network by libertarian pundit John Stossel.

In a suit filed in September, Stossel claimed that Facebook and a third-party vendor defamed him, by labeling a video about wildfires he posted on his page. The label read: “Missing Context. Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people,” and urged readers to click a button to “see why.” The link led to an explanation debunking a claim, which Stossel said he never made in his video.


earn free bitcoin

Defending its fact-checking process before a US district court in California, Meta explained that the labels used by Facebook “are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion.” The same is true for the explanations that the labels link to, the filing argued.

Read More Here!

Share this page to Telegram

Please use the buttons to TWEET & SHARE this post ... then leave your thoughts & feelings in the COMMENT SECTION by scrolling down ... finally If you haven't joined TRUTH PREMIUM, what are you waiting for?

CLICK HERE -->I Want Truth Premium

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Up to 66% Off Mike Lindell's MyPillow Promo Code ETERNAL


Join Our TRUTH INSIDER Email Newsletter For FREE!