Proof CDC Changed Definition of ‘Vaccine’ Because Prior Definition Allowed People “To Claim the COVID-19 Vaccine is Not a Vaccine”
Proof CDC Changed Definition of ‘Vaccine’ Because Prior Definition Allowed People “To Claim the COVID-19 Vaccine is Not a Vaccine”
Joe Hoft with The Gateway Pundit reports:
Back in September, the CDC was caught changing the definition of what a ‘vaccine’ is. This past week we found out why they changed that name.
In September, Larry Johnson at The Gateway Pundit reported on the CDC’s actions to change the definition of a vaccine.
The latest victim of the new Orwellian world of redefining truth comes courtesy of the CDC. They have changed the definition of “vaccine” and “vaccination” because so many vaccinated people are still being infected with a variant of COVID. This is good news for Alex Berenson, who is suing Twitter for defamation.
Here is the tweet about the COVID vaccine that got Alex banned:
It doesn’t stop infection. Or transmission. Don’t think of it as a vaccine.
So look at what the CDC did? Here’s the definition the CDC used on 26 August 2021:
Vaccine– “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Vaccination– “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”
Got it? A vaccine is supposed to produce immunity to a specific disease.
The problem is that COVID 19 is not a disease. It causes a variety of diseases. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky recently admitted that the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines are “waning.”
Rather than admit the Covid vaccine is not working as advertised, CDC took a page out of Orwell’s 1984 and opted for new spin language.
Here is the new definition:
Vaccine– “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”
Note the subtle but important change. Instead of “PRODUCING IMMUNITY” the new definition moves the goal posts and states that their pseudo vaccine “STIMULATES THE BODY’S IMMUNE RESPONSE.”